Monday, November 30, 2009

Emma: The Verdict


All right, so last week's post regarding the Twilight craze was actually supposed to be a post about BBC's Emma --so, without further ado, as I've said, amid glowing praise from trusted friends and fellow Austen-ites, and after hearing that it was simply so much better than any Emma they'd ever seen --

Here goes: after having watched BBC's production of Emma this past weekend amid the glowing praise of trusted friends and period film fans, I must once again join the ranks of the infidels in proclaiming that, as I expected (drumroll please):

I prefer the Gwyneth Paltrow version.

Before you throw a shower of rotten tomatoes in my direction, hear me out:

Emma's my favorite book. (My mother says it's my favorite because I am Emma =). I have read it no less than fifteen times over the last five years, and have most likely shed more tears, giggles, and wistful sighs over its pages than most, and, as I did with Pride & Prejudice, Mansfield Park, and Sense & Sensibility, I read the book before I saw any film adaption. So I'm saying this with Emma's best interest at heart, you see. =)


Character for character, I prefer Miramax's actors. Even as much as I love Michael Gambon, I don't think he was right for the character of Mr. Woodhouse; Mr. Elton was creepier than he was hilarious (although he was one of the funniest characters in the film); Harriet was a little too dense (though younger than Toni Collette, and closer to the age Harriet was in the book: seventeen); and Mrs. Weston was, in my opinion, a little childish. And Frank Churchill and Jane Fairfax were a little too much the focus of the story (although it would have been nice to see a happy medium there, because the Miramax film barely touched on them).

My mom also pointed out that it seemed like Emma and Mr. Knightly hated each other until the last fifteen minutes of the movie. Romola Garai is lovely -I just don't really care for her as an actress (and to all Garai fans reading, I'm sorry to say that watching her in a four hour movie did not cause her to grow on me) -I prefer Paltrow's much wittier and mature (and spoiled =) rendition. And I didn't think the lovely words of Mr. Knightley's proposal could possibly sound unromantic --but that's the way they hit me when they came from Jonny Lee Miller's lips --he might have been too young for the part, and a bit too warm for the character, but Jeremy Northam is by far my favorite Knightly. I didn't see a drastic change of character in Emma, as I did in the book or the Miramax version of the film.


Scene for scene, I prefer Douglas McGrath's screenplay. Line by line, I also prefer McGrath's portrayal of Austen's sharp whit and the characteristic banter of her characters to the burdened dialogue of Sandy Welch's version. Something I always say (and I'm an amateur film critic, not a filmmaker, so don't quote me =) is that a script is different from a book, and that staying truer to certain aspects of a book doesn't necessarily make a film adaption the best; staying true to the heart of the story does --as the screenwriter of one of my favorite movies The Count of Monte Cristo said (paraphrasing) "They hired me to write a screenplay. If you want the book, go read the book -it's a good book. But I'm a screenwriter, not a novelist." =) Sometimes, change is good --sometimes, two hours is enough to tell a story, even if the four or six hour version might be truer to the book.

Above all, I just didn't find the new version of Emma very funny (although it had its moments). And one of the things I love about the book is that it makes me laugh.

Perhaps I would have preferred this new Emma if Andrew Davies of Bleak House, Little Dorrit, and Northanger Abbey fame had written the screenplay (although I love Sandy Welch's script for North & South), or if Richard Armitage had played Mr. Knightley instead of Jonny Lee Miller --alas, it is what it is.


For what it's worth, I did enjoy watching BBC's Emma. The story line is masterful, of course. The costumes are inspiring (Garai was much more modest than she was in Amazing Grace, and a great deal less sensual in her portrayal of Emma than she was as Mrs. Wilberforce). And it was lovely to see how far filmmaking has come since 1996 -a modern adaption was a treat. =) It was also nice to see an Emma that wasn't confined to one hundred and twenty minutes, and to see much more of John Knightley than I did in the '96 version. It's hard to miss me with a Jane Austen movie, even if it doesn't end up being my favorite adaption (I mean, come on --I even like Persuasion). It may yet grow on me upon closer inspection (and, with Austen films, you know there's always going to be closer inspection =). But I found myself constantly comparing it to the 1996 version, even though the quality of this version is far better.


I know what you're thinking: this is the third time (after Pride & Prejudice and Sense & Sensibility) that I've chosen Hollywood's one hundred and twenty minute offerings to BBC and A&E's lengthier portrayals. And then I added insult to injury by preferring Matthew Macfayden to Colin Firth (oh yeah --I'm admitting it in print) and Jeremy Northam to Jonny Lee Miller. Perhaps I'm just a rebel. I really will try not to let it happen again. ;-)


Now, if only BBC would make a decent Mansfield Park. That's something I would really enjoy! And if it ever came between them and the 1999 version --there'd be very little contest. Now, I'll give you the link to view Emma before I duck off and dodge all of the rotten fruit I know ya'll want to throw at me --I've yet to meet someone besides my mother who shares my opinion. =) I'm already cringing at all the glowing Garai and Miller praise I'm expecting in the comment section --but you shan't change my mind, dear readers; I'm determined. =)

Do watch the new Emma, though, for a wholesome treat. As hard as I've been on it, my problems came more from a compare/contrast than a dislike of the film itself. No doubt BBC fans will revel in this new adaption, as I realize I'm part of the precious few who actually enjoyed the Gwyneth Paltrow version of Emma -don't let this heathenous Hollywood infidel ruin your fun. ;-)

32 thoughts shared:

Grace Everest said...

Well, Jasmine, I like BBC's P&P, and its Sense and Senseibility far over the Hollywood renditions. But on this one I'm with you; thumbs up for Gwyeneth Paltrow! And you are right; that's not to say that I didn't enjoy watching the new Emma-- who couldn't help but enjoy watching another version that is at least better than the one with Kate Beckinsale in it! I shall go even farther -- I liked Micheal Gambon more as Mr. Woodhouse than I did the 1996's actor ( I don't know his name).
But no, the movie did not capture the essence of Emma (and that is what we fans of the book are after, is it not?) and all the delightful sweetness that comes out of watching a flawed heorine as she is saved from her own self. As true as the new BBC version was to the book (except for adding in so much more Frank/Jane time) I didn't get that feeling at the end that Emma has been rescued, as I did in the book, and in the 1996 version.
It really is a pity that Richard Armitage didn't get Mr. Knightley's part; he would have played such a good, convincing Mr. Knightley! As it is, Jonny Lee Miller's portrayal couldn't compare to Jeremy Northam's.
And I could go on..... but I won't. Thank you so much for sharing, Jasmine..... shall we go watch the new version again now? :)

Faith said...

Do you know if they'll be re-airing it anytime soon. For some reason, I thought that it wasn't coming out until 2010.
(you really should let us know about "important" things like this ;-))

LR said...

Have you seen the other 1996 version, written by Andrew Davies and starring Kate Beckinsale and Mark Strong? That's by far my favorite, though not a popular opinion, apparently. The casting for every part is perfect, IMO -- Emma is just the right balance of endearing and snobbish, which is what I felt was missing from this newest version; Romala just didn't feel as much like the first lady in the neighborhood to me, she was too casual and even maybe a bit too modern.

I've seen the Paltrow version twice, but must confess I have never been impressed enough by it to remember it...I think it's that the supporting cast is all wrong to me and distracts from Paltrow and Northam...Or maybe I'm just prejudiced because I saw the Beckinsale version first and thought it was perfect. ;)

Normally a I like long, faithful-to-the-book adaptations, but I don't feel like you really need four hours to make a good Emma. A lot of what's entertaining in the book doesn't translate that well to the screen. Davies' screenplay really cuts to the meat of the story and hones in on all the best bits.

Jasmine said...

Faith,

I actually watched it on YouTube; the link for the first episode is in the last paragraph of the post. It actually won't be airing until 2010, just as you thought. =D

Grace Everest,

I knew I could count on you. =D I agree completely with everything you said --including the part about watching Emma again now. ;-D

LR,

No, I haven't seen A & E's version yet, actually. I've heard so much about it, but I never seem to catch it when it airs, and haven't found anyone to lend it to me yet. I'm a Davies fan, though, so I really need to find a way to watch it!

LR said...

The Davies version is, too, available on YouTube. You'll have to do a review when you've watched it! ;)

Jennifer said...

Jasmine,

I love your blog! Very encouraging! And, hey, I am like you! I love the Paltrow Emma better! But anyway, I have read a few other things on your blog, and they are like I said very encouraging to young ladies! Keep up the good work!

Jennifer

His Handmaidens said...

Definitely the Kate Beckinsale version LR. I could have a preference as it is the first one I saw, but I doubt it. Thanks for sharing your thoughts Jasmine. The differing opinions are really of little consequence in the long run, and it is good for all of us to hear others opinions.

Dutchess said...

I started reading Emma several times, but decided she was a bad influence due to us being the exact same person...:-P

I think I'll watch the BBC version just for the costumes!

Alexandra said...

Yaay! Another Austen fan who likes the two-hour-versions better! I haven't even seen the 2008 S&S yet, and it will be a while if I do, if ever...the 1995 S&S is just so awesome. An S&S without Kate Winslet's Marianne, Emma Thompson's Elinor or...gasp...Hugh Laurie's Mr. Palmer??? Unthinkable.

Same goes for the P&P adaptations. While the scales tip a WEE bit in the 1995's direction, I really, really liked the 2005 adaptation. And yes, I loved McFayden.

And now for the Emma. I've only seen half of this new adaptation so far, but I agree with everything you said. Romola was cute, but the Miramax film...there was no comparison. At all. Johnny Lee Miller was nowhere near Jeremy Northam. Now, as you said, if it was Richard Armitage...well, hehe, he might have just given JN a run for his money, but Johnny Lee Miller??? Nope.

Over all, I liked it, I'll buy it when it comes out on DVD, but it was not the best at all.

tammy Kay said...

Jasmine,
I watched the entire version online for free because I missed it on BBC. I personally loved it, but I also love the Gwyneth Paltrow version as well. I thought Mr. Woodhouse was by far much funnier in this film. I though Knightly to be charming and romantic. There were parts that could have been better but it was different for me in a good way. I love that it wasn't an hour and half long. I loved the scenery and costumes. I think it was well done. I might have chosen a different Emma if it was up to me. I'm being nit picky though.
Thanks for the review, I was wondering what you though. :)

Lauren said...

Having not yet read Emma (you have to spread the joys of new Austen books out over the course of your life!) and having only watched the Paltrow version under heavy distraction, I am an unworthy critic. So I'll just have to take your word for it, Jasmine, for now, and have an Emma fest in a year or so where I read the book and watch all the versions in as short a time as possible! (-:

Faith said...

Oops! My mistake. I thought that the link would take me to the BBC store, or Amazon to buy it. Thanks! (by the way, I'm watching it right now ;-))

Alexandrea

They have the new version of S&S on youtube also. (Found it while looking for Emma) You might think you clicked the wrong video, but don't worry, just skip the first 2 min. or so. (Hate it when they throw in "surprises" like that.)

Hannah said...

Sorry to all of you who prefer the shorter versions, but I love the long ones. (Almost all of them) The long versions of P&P (McFayden was the only redeeming quality of the new one)and S&S are absolutely the best. While the new Northanger Abbey (2007) with J.J. Feild as Henry Tilney is excellent. I am also a fan of Persuasion, what can I say... I LOVE Jane Austen films.

And for those of you who have some time to spare for an excellent version of Mansfield Park try the 1983 BBC one. It is the book come to life. Fanny is played by the lovely Sylvestra Le Touzel, and Edmund :) by Nicolas Farrell. (Yes they play Mr. and Mrs. Thornton in Amazing grace, they are so cute together!)
Yes the adaptation takes it's time but in my opinion is well worth it. I just couldn't imagine any one else playing Fanny or Edmund. My sister and I love borrowing it from the library and cuddling down in the couch for an afternoon or evening.

I love to hear everyone's opinions about their favorite Austen films, as it is a subject near and dear to our hearts. But I must say something that may come across as harsh... about the new P&P.

Keira Knightly ruins it! That pouty lip. AH!!! I hate it, every time she is unhappy it sticks out further (our lips don't naturally do that, well that far). She just ruins the film for me. (Besides Jennifer Ehle is just the perfect Lizzy)
Thanks for letting me get that off my chest. I hope I didn't make any enemies with that comment. :) But everyone is allowed their own opinion. (Besides the music from the new P&P is beautiful.)

Well I think I should stop while I am ahead. xD Thanks for the opinion on the new Emma Jasmine. You are probably right but I just have to see it for fun anyway.

~Miss Hannah

P.S.
Miss Bates in the Gywneth Paltrow version is the BEST!

Kiri said...

I've been eagerly awaiting your review of the new Emma! I own both the Kate and the Gweneth versions and love them both. They both have their strong and weak points, Miramax's having fewer weak points, in my opinion... :) So I've been wondering how the new version would fit in.

While I've not seen the new version yet (dial-up and YouTube don't mix well), I didn't like Johnny Lee Miller in the trailer. I'm still eager to see it, but I don't think it will replace Miramax. I'm not even sure how it will compare with A&E. However, I'm still prepared for an enjoyable- if not perfect- 4 hours.

On another note, while I'm right with you on Pride and Prejudice, I really enjoyed the 2007 Sense and Sensibility. In the 1995 version, Emma Thompson was too old to be convincing, and I've never been a fan of Kate Winslet. Should I be dodging tomatoes now? :) But perhaps the thing I like most about BBC's version, is that Willoughby comes out looking like a scoundrel rather than us feeling sorry for him. I don't remember you ever posting about S&S, so I'll have to do some digging through the archives to find why you prefer the 1995 version.

Thanks so much for your blog. I always enjoy my stop here!

Blessings,
Kiri

P.S. You really should see the Kate Beckinsale version. Every Emma fan should see it at least once. I'd loan it to you, but I don't think you'd have time to watch it at the SOS and I'm a 24 hour drive from Houston...

joyfulhelpmeet said...

Hey Jasmine, just wondering (please dont hate me im just curious) is it legal to watch them on youtube?? I thought that it was illegal to upload/download/view these films without paying? I could , of course, be wrong, i am just wondering if you know

Mikaela said...

Hannah--thanks for the recommendation on Mansfield Park! I loved that book, but hadn't heard of any decent adaptations (I'll sign a petition to BBC with you, Jasmine!). I'll definitely have to look into that one.
And Richard Armitage as Mr. Knightly...*sigh*...Jasmine, you just ruined EVERY Emma adaptation for me!
I do have to say that I much prefer P&P with Ehle than with Knightley...Keira is beautiful and does a fine job as a period actress, but her attitude, her manner,and her eyes are too sensual and conceited for me. There is no comparison between that distracting "aura" and Jennifer Ehle's sparkling eyes, cheeriness, and gentility.

Amber said...

I usually DO NOT prefer the BBC Adaptions.:/ My favorite S&S is the 1995 with Kate Winslet. To me its painful to think of anyone else trying to portray Marianne's character.;) I did not like the 2008 version. And I did not like the even older version...at all.

I prefer the 2005 P&P version over the 1995 version with Colin Firth. *gasp* Even though I am not a fan of Keira Knightley, I did love Matthew Macfayden!=) To me Colin Firth is...NOT Mr. Darcy to say the least...=)

I am yet to see a Mansfield Park that I like, the same goes with Northanger Abbey.Any recommendations?:)

Now for Emma.:) The first version I ever watched was the Paltrow version. And although I loved JN, I liked JLM better.:) I did not like Paltrow as Emma. Not because there's anything *wrong* with her, but becuase to me, she didn't fit the part.

I did like Romola's performance, however(you knew it was coming...=) because she's so cute, and to me, she just *looks* like Emma.=)

*chokes* I DO agree with you about Mr. Elton, though. What were they thinking about casting him??!! He just looked SO..."creepy" like you say.;) I also did not like the casting of Harriet, I am yet to see a Harriet portrayal that I like of her.:/

But I LOVED Michael Gambon!! He added such a funny part to the story!

One more complaint; I would have liked to see Emma and Mr. Knightley have more screen time. Whenever they ARE on screen it seems like they just have to argue.

BUT they are a lot of sweet moments between them that I love. The dance scene, the scene where Mr. Knightley is holding the baby, ect.

I laughed and cried throughout the whole thing, and overall, I loved it.=)

~Amber

P.S. The costumes in my eyes are amazing!

Antoinette K. said...

Thanks for the review Miss. Jasmine!

I have not seen the new BBC one yet, but I will probably think the same way you do, as I have seen about 3 or 4 different versions and the Gwyneth Paltro one rulles them all! ;) I have not read the book, but if you say it is really good, then I am sure it is and I will have to find time to read it in my Jane Austen, 7 novel Barnes and Noble, old-fashioned looking book I have and read it!!!! :) I like how witty Emma is in the 1996 version, the other versions sem to make her more dull, or not as great of a character! :)

Well, thanks again, and I will have to watch the new BBC version soon with my mom! It is so nice to know that Romola Garai is more modestly dressed in this movie (and less sensual!)! ;)

Thanks again so very much!

Blessings,

Miss. Antoinette

PS. Visit my blog! http://practicalsimplicity.com/blog/
Visit my photography blog! http://practicalsimplicityphotos.blogspot.com/

Fopias said...

I haven't seen this one yet...though I DID like Jeremy Northam, so I doubt Miller could beat him. However, there is one aspect on which I don't agree. I prefer Collin Firth to MacFayden, but then, I guess it's personal opinion there :D

I do like the character of Elizabeth Bennet and Darcy in P&P...of what I've read I like that one best...

Jo March said...

The only version of Emma I've seen is the one LR mentioned, with Kate Beckinsdale and Mark Strong. Emma is my favorite Jane Austen book, and I was very pleased at how well that version captured Emma's high spiritedness, as well as her more annoying side.
(I also liked it because Emma has dark hair, and since I have dark hair myself, I like dark haired heroines :)

Good for you, reading the book before watching the movie. :) That's our Mom's "rule" for watching most movie adaptions of books, and it makes sense.

Have you seen any adaptions of Little Women? We saw the 1994 version and couldn't stand it, and the 1978 TV series version is in our Netflix queue, and hopefully that one will be better.

Jasmine said...

Hannah,

I *loved* your long comment! Thank you! =D I don't care for Keira either actually --but I also dislike Jennifer Ehle (sorry, Mikaela!), so it all (well, not all, but a lot of it ;-) comes down to Mr. Darcy --and I was disappointed when I watched the 1995 P & P because Colin Firth wasn't how I'd imagined Darcy would be; Matthew was. =)

Joyful Helpmeet,

Actually, that's a good question. ;-) I was afraid of the same thing, so I researched it: it seems that as long as the YouTube videos are ten minutes and under, and as long as the poster isn't making a profit, it's legal to view them.

Comments on these posts are always the most fun. =D

J

Ella said...

Jasmine, my dear, I cannot give a good opinion on this, as I have been unable to watch it yet. When you only have one computer with internet, there seems to be a perpetual line for it.

However, Jeremy Northram is "the" Mr. Knightley to me and Gwyneth Paltrow is "the" Emma. But I am willing to give this new one a try.

I did enjoy BBC's Sense and Sensibility, after I watched it several times =)

I will admit, though, I do think you are delusional about Matthew MacFayden.

Mrs.Rabe said...

We love all things Jane here at our house! Even Persuasion!

We love Colin Firth and Jennifer Ehle as Darcy and Lizzie, like the Keira and Matthew version but hate the ending!

We don't like the Kate Beckinsale version of Emma - Mark Strong looks way to old to be Mr. Knightley and Kate as Emma is too grumpy!

We really enjoy Gwyneth's version of Emma - we adore Jeremy Northam as Knightly!

That being said we did really like this version! It took a bit to get over Romola who looked and acted at times like both Drew Barrymore and Cameron Diaz - we are weird I know! :)

We liked Jonny Lee Miller as Mr. Knightly and at least Frank Churchill didn't have the hideous wig that Ewan MacGregor had in the other version.

This was a fun post, Jasmine! My daughters and I love to read your blog.

Miss Jen said...

Oh my~ I was so excited
to read your review~ Jasmine
and whole heartily agree with you!

Although.... the 2009
Emma is not my favorite....
I enjoyed watching it
and thought it was
good but not brilliant.
The Cinematography was stunning...
and the acting was good.
I must confess I too was bothered
by Emma's posture and her outlandish mannerisms. *sigh*
I think my favorite performance was that of Frank Churhill~ he did a fabulous job... portraying a restless and impetuous "Frank"
Didn't he play in "North and South"
as Fredrick Hale?!

I liked how they began the film
from Emma's childhood and how they ended it on the sea... but please no wedding and dress?! *sigh*
The proposal scene was very
touching and romantic.... but
for me it was alarming that
a woman would grab a man and kiss
him... not very 'lady like'
I think.

Emma's sorrow for Miss Bates
was more of "self pity"
than a heart of "true repentance"...
like it is wonderfully conveyed in the 1996 version.

Gwyneth is an academy award winning actress and it shows. ;)
And... Jeremy Northam~ well
he is superb Mr.Knightley!!
His "badly done" scene is one
of the most amazing movie
scenes on film!! ;)

Anyways, it is always fun and
exciting to see a new version
of the beloved classic...
but like you my favorite remains
to be the 'Gwyneth Paltrow Version'
*smiles... sigh*

Thanks for a delightful review!
Loved the pics too!!
Love Always in
Christ~ Jen

Rachel said...

I didn't like this version of Emma at all. 'Emma' herself was irritating - and I love Emma! And Mr Knightly seemed a bit simpering instead of the epitome of manliness - which he is. As well as that, they seemed to forget that it was a period drama, and so Emma would have had a sense of decorum, and would not have ran to answer the door herself. Ahem. Rant done. But I recommend the Kate Beckinsale version over the Gwyneth Paltrow one :)

Leanna said...

I only had to watch the first two parts of epis. 1 to know that I like the Paltrow version better! You were absolutely right! =) Garai kind of annoyed me. And Jeremy Northam is a MUCH better Mr. Knightly! But thanks for the review to give us the heads up. =)

Sarah said...

Hi Jasmine,
Well, I hate to spoil the party...I can totally understand your point of view on the newest Emma, but I have to say that it is my very favorite version...

I'm a little biased on this version, I suppose, as Rupert Evans, who play Frank Churchill one of my favorite actors, not only because I love his personality, but he reminds me of a very good friend of mine. (looks, gestures, & the way he talks...NOT the way he acts--taking advantage of Emma, of course. :D)

I really enjoyed BBC's choice of characters, (forgive me for being contradictory) I thought they were a big improvement, & I loved Garai as Emma.

I do have to say that I'm definately NOT an expert on 'criticizing' movies, though...2 of my siblings are the ones who do that.

I do want to thank you for your very light easy way of criticizing though, as at the end, you give permission for everyone to make their own decision. :D

Have a great day, & keep on with your film reviews!!! I really enjoy them!
Sarah

Stephanie said...

I love the book Emma, too, and just finished watching this new Emma last night. I loved it. :) I liked this new one better because it fleshes out the story more and makes Emma's marriage to Mr.Knightly more believable because you can see the characters' range of emotion. The only thing that drove me crazy all versions was Mrs. Elton's jabbering (of course). :) But,then again, that the way she's supposed to be. I am still willing to watch the Paltrow version and still like it, I just like this one better. :) But I do agree with you about liking Matthew Mcfayden over Colin Firth. The BBC P&P, though accurate with the book, was too slow moving.

~Stephanie

Anonymous said...

Though I only saw very little of the new "Emma", (whether that supports or crushes the weight of my opinion, I don't know!(: ) I decided pretty quickly that I liked the old one better. I watched the beginning and the end, and in the end, Mr. Knightley seemed too mechanical in the BBC version. I did enjoy the scenery and costumes and all that, but I must agree with you, Jasmine!

Sincerely,

Jennifer W.

P.S. I'm new to your blog, but I hope to visit often! God bless you!

Melissa M. said...

I watched the new version twice, and at first I liked it better than the other Emmas, but after the 2nd viewing, I do believe I like the 1996 version better. I did like how some things were better explained, and I liked Emma's father and her relationship with him, as it seemed loving...but there were some things I didn't like, and in general I like the actors better in the 1996 version.

Anonymous said...

Hello there,
I just read your opinion on the new film adaption and I must say that, even though I disagree, I will not throw with rotten tomatoes in you :)
I didn't read the book, it is true, but I could not watch the earlier version of Emma. It did not appeal to me. (I tried to, but after the first 5 mins I couldn't..)
Anyway, I respect your opinion (you certainly have some arguments there), but do not expect everyone to be mad on you :P
After all, it's a matter of taste as well...

Anonymous said...

Doesn't surprise me a bit; after a while, we've had enough remakes! The Paltrow version's awesome, but there's also the great A&E version; have you seen it?

Jennifer